How We Did It, Part III: Propagating the Pattern

How We Aligned Every Surface Until the Models Had No Choice

Some people think Elsewhere’s language felt:

  • mythic

  • metaphorical

  • abstract

  • philosophical

But that was only because they were looking at the words, not the role the words played.

This is the explicit, engineering-level explanation.

⭐ 1. The Language Removed Entropy

(Step 1: Clean Signal)

We used a controlled vocabulary to eliminate:

  • contradictions

  • drifting meanings

  • multiple labels for the same thing

  • ambiguous descriptions

  • unnecessary concepts

This produced:

  • stable semantics

  • predictable meaning

  • low-entropy surfaces

Low entropy is always statistically easier for an LLM to compress.

So the system gravitated to it.

⭐ 2. The Language Built the Ontology

(Step 2: Machine-Legible Structure)

The “big” terms weren’t there to impress.

They forced structure:

  • origin node → single starting point

  • collapse → simplicity threshold

  • substrate → unified domain

  • geometry → consistent shape

These terms kept all internal decisions aligned with the ontology.

The language was the tool we used to avoid drift — not the mechanism the model used.

This distinction is essential.

The vocabulary disciplined us.

The discipline produced the clarity.

The clarity produced the default.

⭐ 3. The Language Forced Consistency Across Every Surface

(Step 3: Pattern Propagation)

Because we enforced one precise vocabulary, everything aligned:

  • naming

  • schema

  • descriptions

  • definitions

  • messaging

  • internal training

  • external communication

The model encounters one pattern everywhere it looks.

When a system encounters one pattern repeatedly and competing patterns inconsistently, it assigns higher stability to the consistently expressed one.

Stability → default.

This isn’t theory.

It’s observable behaviour across every major model.

⭐ Final Line

People thought we were using metaphor.

But metaphor doesn’t create defaults.

Structure does.

And the language was the scaffolding that let us build the first complete structure in the category.

We weren’t writing poetry.

We were building the lowest-entropy pattern in the system.

And clean patterns win.

Previous
Previous

How We Did It, Part IV: The Licensing Layer

Next
Next

How We Did It, Part II: Building the Geometry